Cleaning Act Is the “five seconds” rule true about eating food that has fallen to the ground? Falling food on the ground, eating food that has fallen on the ground The amount of contamination transmitted to food does not depend on the time of contact with the surface
Is the “five seconds” rule true about eating food that has fallen to the ground?
When a piece of your food falls to the ground, is it okay to eat it less than five seconds after it falls to the ground? Researchers have found that surface contamination is more important than when food stays on it.
The researchers performed the experiment on food and its level of contamination in the laboratory and obtained results. The five-second rule may not be very reliable, but since it includes our beliefs about eating, it is not a bad idea to look into it.
The question now is whether the five-second rule can remove contamination from Cleaning Act food. This seems to be a bit complicated, because the contamination of food with germs depends on the surface and how much it has contaminated it. But have you ever wondered where the five-second rule came from? Falling food on the ground and eating it quickly is an experience that may have happened to many people.
But what does science say about food falling to the ground? Is this food unhealthy and five seconds is enough to get infected?
The first experiment was conducted by Gillian Clark, a student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who contaminated the ground and then threw food on it. The experiment showed that the food becomes contaminated within five seconds after the food falls to the ground, but the extent of the contamination is unknown.
Do you know how much bacteria is transferred to food from the ground in five seconds?
Researchers have found that the duration of food contact with the soil affects contamination.
They placed the food on the ground for five, 30, and 60 seconds, measured the contamination, and measured the study after two, four, eight, and 24 hours.
Experiments have shown that the amount of contamination transmitted does not depend on the time of contact with the surface, but the amount of surface contamination is important. In addition, this type of surface material is also effective in pollution, for example, Cleaning Act carpet is a better place than ceramics and wood to fall food and its pollution rate is less and only one percent, while at the same time 48 to 70 percent of the wood surface Bacteria are transmitted to food.
The best advice from experts is to keep your hands, dishes and surfaces clean to prevent the transmission of germs.
Sleeping late leads to weight gain
Late sleep, side effects of late sleep, weight gain, obesity
Staying up late causes weight gain
Sleeping late leads to weight gain
For many people, adulthood and adolescence is a period of not sleeping at night, but new research shows that staying up late has effects on weight gain.
Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, and colleagues at Columbia University have shown that the later a young person or teen goes to bed, the more likely they are to gain weight. According to the researchers, this is the first observational study to examine the relationship between sleep time and body mass index (BMI) between different age groups.
They found that the later people went to bed during adolescence and youth, the more weight they gained over a five-year period. For every hour you go to bed late, your body mass increases by 2.1 kg.
According to health organizations, 14- to 17-year-olds need to get eight to 10 hours of sleep a night, while young people between the ages of 18 and 25 need about seven to nine hours of sleep a night.
One study found that only 31 percent of high school students had at least eight hours of sleep a night, and about 30 percent of adults reported getting less than six hours of sleep a night. Lack of sleep can lead to health problems. Inadequate sleep can even increase the risk of catching a cold and leading to early signs of heart disease.
The findings are published in the journal Sleep.
Why does the world look darker in times of depression?
The world looks darker when we feel miserable and talk about grief. The results of a Cleaning Act new study show that the correlation between our feelings and colors is more than just a metaphor or simile, and a scientific explanation can be found.
The results of this study indicate that feelings of sadness and grief can affect the way colors are recognized. Researchers at the University of Rochester have found that people who feel uncomfortable recognize colors in the blue-yellow spectrum less accurately than those who feel happy or fun or are naturally normal.
Previous research has shown that emotion can affect various visual processes. Some studies have shown that there is a link between feelings of depression and reduced sensitivity to visual contrasts. Because sensitivity to these contrasts is an essential visual process in recognizing and receiving color, researchers have wondered whether this may be particularly relevant to discomfort and the ability to perceive and receive colors in individuals.
In the study, researchers asked 127 participating students to watch an emotional film and then fill out a form to test their visual ability. Participants were randomly asked to watch a disturbing or comedic film to evoke feelings of sadness or joy or fun, respectively. The sensory effects of these films have been proven in previous studies, and researchers are convinced that these films can evoke such emotions in people.
After watching the film, participants were shown a series of colored spots and asked to Cleaning Act say if each spot was colored red, yellow, green, or blue. Participants who watched the sad movies perceived the colors less accurately than those who watched the entertaining movies. But this was only true for colors in the blue-yellow spectrum. For red-green colors, no difference in color recognition was observed between the two groups of participants.